The Delhi High Court on Friday asked two advocates to place before the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) their petition against alleged misappropriation/misuse of funds to the tune of Rs 21,75,03,000 sanctioned to eight Delhi government hospitals for remodelling/upgrade. The complaint is regd in CVC by petitioners.
The court asked advocates Sagar Sharma and Sparsh Goyal, petitioners in the case, to place their grievance before the CVC as they sought a CBI probe into the alleged misappropriation. In their plea, the petitioners accused the eight hospitals—Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital, Lok Nayak Hospital, Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Lal Bahadur Shastri Hospital and Rajiv Gandhi Superspeciality Hospital—of not putting to proper use the funds sanctioned by the Delhi government way back in the year 2016. “…patients are suffering due to non-availability of proper medical facilities and the respondents misused the sanctioned funds raised for proper medical facilities,” said their plea.
They alleged that respondent No. 2 to No. 11 (The Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), The Public Works Department (PWD) and the eight hospitals) had misappropriated the sanctioned funds of the taxpayers to the tune of Rs 21,75,03,000 which was sanctioned for the engagement of consultants for remodeling, upgrade and expansion work in the above-said respondent-hospitals by which patients can get better treatment for the Health Services and good medical facilities in respondent-hospitals run by the Government of NCT of Delhi.
In this case Doc-Patients crying for basic treatment facilities but high official authorities are busy in misappropriating the public funds.
It said the fund was passed from the DGHS to PWD for engaging consultants and undertaking the work which was necessitated as the hospitals lack proper infrastructure and even diagnostic laboratories, forcing patients to spend huge amounts on private healthcare. The petitioners say it was on their visit to the Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital for a health concern that they realised that the hospital was lacking in many basic medical facilities.
They then made several inquiries and filed RTI applications to learn that “an amount of Rs 9,27,63000 has been sanctioned to respondent no.4,7,9 (Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital, Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital, and Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital) in year 2016 but RTI reply by respondent no.4 dated 04.04.2018 reveals that the work has not yet started”. “Similarly, An amount of Rs.2,57,40,000 has been sanctioned to respondent no.5 (Lok Nayak Hospital) but RTI reply by the hospital said no amount has been allotted to it,” it said.
Similar was the case with other hospitals. The petitioners had sent a written complaint to the Health Secretary of Delhi government in this regard but received no response.
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. The user acknowledges the following:
There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website;
The user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her own information and use;
The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
The information provided on the site is of a general nature regarding the law. The readers are advised not to act upon this general information. Please take further and appropriate advice based on the facts of your case from The Indian Lawyer by logging a query.
The Indian Lawyer disclaims its liability for any adverse acts taken by the readers based on the general information provided by the site.